Fight COVID Milwaukee protective behaviors and risk communications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on society, causing significant disruptions to everyday life. Risk communication strategies can play an important role in risk management as they allow individuals to prepare for and respond to public health emergencies appropriately. The aim of this study is to investigate public risk behaviors, perceptions of risk and risk communication, and experiences with COVID-19 to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on our community and to better inform public health decisions about communicating and reducing personal risk. Nine virtual focus groups were conducted with 79 residents of Milwaukee County. Audio transcripts of focus group recordings were qualitatively analyzed using MAXQDA. Predominant themes identified include public risk protective behaviors, the emotional toll associated with lockdown measures, and risk communication. Our findings provide a better understanding of how adults, African American and Hispanic groups in particular, viewed the risk communications and protective behaviors associated with COVID-19, how their lives were impacted by the pandemic, and how to effectively communicate public information about personal risk. These findings can help guide risk communication efforts and public health policy interventions for potential infection outbreaks in the future.

Student Leadership Development Initiative for Medical Students: Lessons Learned From Transitioning to Virtual Modalities.

Leadership training is a necessary component of undergraduate medical education. Our group successfully implemented a student-led organization starting from 2016 (Student Leadership Development Initiative; SLDI) that aimed to provide medical students with exposure to physician-leader career paths in an informal, organic, interactive setting. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a shift to online programming, and given the high prevalence of ZOOMTM fatigue, we incorporated monthly, freely available, self-directed modules as an additional leadership training opportunity. The goals of this study are to assess the (1) feasibility of and participation in a virtual student organization focused on leadership training, (2) whether students' perceptions of the importance of leadership were associated with participation in SLDI, and (3) lessons learned from transitioning to virtual modalities. An anonymous, retrospective cross-sectional survey with 13-items was distributed through an email listserv and a 6-question survey was sent to attendees following each virtual group-discussion. A Fisher's exact test was conducted to assess whether the number of modules completed was associated with students' perception of leadership importance. Survey results showed that 85% strongly agreed or agreed that SLDI helped them develop professional goals and career paths, and 74% reported benefits in becoming more compassionate physician leaders and valuing wellness. All respondents completed ≥1 self-directed module, and the students' perception of leadership importance did not influence the number of self-directed modules completed (p > .05). Most participants (63%) attended ≥67% of virtual events, and postevent feedback was positive; however, only 46% of respondents reported meeting someone new at events and 32% reported that they intended on connecting with new contacts. Our results suggest that virtual leadership student-organization, involving small-group discussions and self-directed modules, is feasible and beneficial for medical students. However, the inability to promote meaningful networking opportunities is a major limitation of a virtual training model.

Community focus groups about a COVID-19 individual risk assessment tool: access, understanding and usefulness.

To make informed COVID-19 related decisions, individuals need information about their personal risks and how those risks may vary with specific demographic and health characteristics. The Fight COVID Milwaukee web-based risk assessment tool allows for assessment of COVID-19 mortality risk as a function of personal and neighborhood characteristics. The purpose of this study is to explore public understanding of this risk assessment tool and risk perception through community focus groups. Individuals were recruited from the general adult population in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, USA, to participate in nine online focus groups where the risk assessment tool was presented for feedback. Three main themes were identified in the focus groups regarding the web-based risk assessment tool: some challenges in accessibility, variable ease of understanding, and personal usefulness but uncertain value for others. This paper explores how members of the community interpret individual risk assessments and life expectancy estimations, and how these vary with age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and pre-existing comorbidities.

Navigating misinformation and political polarization of COVID-19: interviews with Milwaukee, Wisconsin county public health officials.

Introduction: The spread of misinformation combined with the political polarization of the COVID-19 vaccine created major challenges for public health officials responding to the COVID pandemic and vaccine roll-out. The challenges public health officials faced when making safety recommendations and promoting the vaccine only exacerbated the already exhausting work conditions they experienced since the start of the pandemic. Combating misinformation while receiving inadequate political support led to burnout for many public health officials. As such, they had to adapt and develop new strategies for increasing vaccine acceptance and decreasing vaccine hesitancies. Method: This study was conducted through qualitative interviews with seven Milwaukee County public health officials. This study aimed to determine how public health officials perceived misinformation and political polarization during the pandemic. Additionally, the study aimed to learn more about strategies county health officials used to combat misinformation while increasing vaccine uptake in their communities. Results: Thematic analysis of the interviews identified three major challenges faced by public health officials in promoting vaccination: dissemination of misinformation in media, political polarization of COVID and its contribution to vaccine acceptance and COVID fatigue, and assessment of the risks associated with disease severity versus vaccine safety considering limited public health resources. Discussion: Learning from public health officials allows us to better understand their perceptions of the extent of local vaccine hesitancies and their advice on how to counteract fears and misinformation and to promote COVID vaccine uptake. Political polarization of COVID and misinformation affected community vaccine acceptance and challenged local public health leadership.

Muslims, Islam, and Organ Donation: Righting Social Narratives and Designing Ethically Balanced Educational Interventions.

The popular narrative about Muslims and organ donation, especially about Muslims in the diaspora, is that Muslims have unfavorable sentiments about organ donation. Furthermore, this skepticism is associated with Islam in the sense that pious Muslims are regarded to be more averse to organ donation, and Islamic edicts that judge organ donation to be religiously forbidden are thought to be erroneous. Based on this narrative, public health leaders encourage organ donation by teaching Muslims about the social advantages of organ donation and linking these advantages to religious edicts that consider organ donation to be lawful. We examined the factual and moral foundations of this narrative of Muslims, Islam, and organ donation. Our analysis demonstrated that the narrative is undermined by methodological flaws in existing empirical research and misconceptions of Islamic normativity. We contend that Muslim concerns about organ donation extend beyond whether it is religiously allowed and that contextual circumstances produce diverse and equally acceptable Islamic viewpoints on organ donation. As a result, we advocate that educational initiatives aid informed decision-making by debunking misunderstandings about organ donation and promoting plurality of Islamic ethicolegal positions on the practice.

Community focus groups about a COVID-19 individual risk assessment tool: access, understanding and usefulness.

Background : In order to make informed COVID-19 related decisions, individuals need information about their personal risks and how those risks may vary with specific demographic and health characteristics. The Fight COVID MKE web=based risk assessment tool allows for assessment of COVID-19 mortality risk as a function of personal and neighborhood characteristics. The purpose of this study is to explore public understanding of this risk assessment tool and risk perception through community focus groups. Methods : Individuals were recruited from Milwaukee County to participate in nine online focus groups where the risk assessment tool was presented for feedback. Focus group transcripts were then analyzed qualitatively for common themes using MAXQDA. Results : Three main themes were identified in the focus groups regarding the web-based risk assessment tool: access, understanding, and usefulness. Conclusions : This paper explores how members of the community interpret individual risk assessments and life expectancy estimations, and how these vary with age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and pre-existing comorbidities. Understanding COVID-19 infection and progression rates, and how they vary with a full set of patient-specific characteristics is critical for effective policy and practice responses to the COVID-19 pandemic as well as for future infection outbreaks.